<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE7 low acceptance ? Maybe&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: acceptance &#187; IE7 low acceptance ? Maybe…</title>
		<link>http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>acceptance &#187; IE7 low acceptance ? Maybe…</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/05/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry</title>
		<link>http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/05/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I surely hope it too.
IE6 is just a piece of junk that have no places in today computer era (imho).
I too have to live with it (and js with IE is just the hellish nightmare you can have), but I too hope this annoucement will get us ride of it.

About silverlight,  I have to admit I never really looked at it. But I sure will.
The fact that you say it&#039;s IE only trigger a big red cannon to fire at it, but I won&#039;t light the fuse before a review.
But isn&#039;t silverlight more a concurrent of Flash, than an ajax library ?
Anyway, I&#039;ll take a look on it. You trigered my interest.

By the way, do you remember Atlas ? The first ASP.NET 2 ajax toolkit ?
It was labeled as &quot;cross browser&quot;. Well, for microsoft, cross browser was IE and Firefox.
The rest, bah, they are not real browsers....
http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/21/atlas-disappoints-in-cross-browser-support/
http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2006/4/18/3648
http://www.musingsfrommars.org/2006/04/nothing-to-cheer-here-microsoft-atlas.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I surely hope it too.<br />
IE6 is just a piece of junk that have no places in today computer era (imho).<br />
I too have to live with it (and js with IE is just the hellish nightmare you can have), but I too hope this annoucement will get us ride of it.</p>
<p>About silverlight,  I have to admit I never really looked at it. But I sure will.<br />
The fact that you say it&#8217;s IE only trigger a big red cannon to fire at it, but I won&#8217;t light the fuse before a review.<br />
But isn&#8217;t silverlight more a concurrent of Flash, than an ajax library ?<br />
Anyway, I&#8217;ll take a look on it. You trigered my interest.</p>
<p>By the way, do you remember Atlas ? The first ASP.NET 2 ajax toolkit ?<br />
It was labeled as &#8220;cross browser&#8221;. Well, for microsoft, cross browser was IE and Firefox.<br />
The rest, bah, they are not real browsers&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/21/atlas-disappoints-in-cross-browser-support/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/21/atlas-disappoints-in-cross-browser-support/</a><br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2006/4/18/3648" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2006/4/18/3648</a><br />
<a href="http://www.musingsfrommars.org/2006/04/nothing-to-cheer-here-microsoft-atlas.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.musingsfrommars.org/2006/04/nothing-to-cheer-here-microsoft-atlas.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/05/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure ... personally I hope this kills off IE 666.  I can&#039;t use png files on my site because the majority still uses the browser of death.

Are you paying any attention to Silver Light?  My company is pushing to use it, even though it&#039;s IE only.  I think they&#039;re trying to hold onto their death grip over the whole of computing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure &#8230; personally I hope this kills off IE 666.  I can&#8217;t use png files on my site because the majority still uses the browser of death.</p>
<p>Are you paying any attention to Silver Light?  My company is pushing to use it, even though it&#8217;s IE only.  I think they&#8217;re trying to hold onto their death grip over the whole of computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: microsoft &#187; IE7 low acceptance ? Maybe&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>microsoft &#187; IE7 low acceptance ? Maybe&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webalis.com/2007/10/05/ie7-low-acceptance-maybe/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] taids wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taids wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.262 seconds -->
